Case Studies
Case of A.S.
After Ms. S refused to marry an American citizen, he sent a "poison pen" letter to the police, accusing her of being a spy. She was then called into the consulate, and the consular officer revoked her visa. Ms. S then contacted our firm. We were able to intercede on her behalf and the consular officer issued to her a new 3-year B visa.
Case of K.R.
Ms. R. was permanently barred by the US Embassy in New Delhi, India for committing a material misrepresentation. She was forced to sign a Voluntary Statement dictated to her by an abusive consular officer and that declaration was used as the basis of the bar. She then contacted us, and we were able to intervene and have the decision overturned.
Case of S.S.
Mrs. S., an Indian national, has worked in California on an H-1B visa for many years. Her husband, who was in H-4 status, returned to India and applied to renew his H-4 visa at the consulate in Chennai. His application was denied under 221(g), and remained pending for more than 7 months. Mrs. S. then retained us, and within a couple of weeks, Mr. S. received his visa and was reunited with his wife in the US.
Case of V.Y.
V’s case brings to mind the dangers of DIY lawyering. His US citizen son thought that he was being helpful by volunteering to prepare his dad’s I-485 adjustment of status application. But because of mistakes in the initial application, USCIS rejected the application. It was then necessary to refile the corrected application. But by then, V accumulated unlawful presence in the US. Compounding the problem: V’s son did not submit an I-131 application for advance parole (authorization to travel). So when V’s sister unexpectedly passed away in his home country, V had to leave the US urgently. As a result, his adjustment of status application was abandoned and refused. V then contacted us, and we assisted him in consular processing at the US Embassy. We had to address issues of a potential misrepresentation in his previous entry to the United States and unlawful presence. After a brief visa interview, the consul issued the visa to him.
Case of T.S.
T had a complicated immigration history going back 25 years, with various problems. But when she applied for an immigrant visa to join her daughter in the US, she was accused of committing a willful, material misrepresentation under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i). But what was peculiar was that it was not clear what the misrepresentation was and when it was committed. T’s lawyer addressed inquiries to the embassy, but the embassy shunted him away — stating that T should apply for an immigrant waiver. The problem was that she was not eligible for a waiver as the mother of a US citizen. T then contacted us. We addressed our request for a clarification to consular management. The consular manager reviewed the case, and realizing that the consular officer had made an error, re-opened it and removed the 6Ci finding.
Case of M.L.
M had arrived to the US to visit her US citizen daughter and grandchild. Her plan was to return back home after a couple of months. But the pandemic hit, and everything changed. She then decided to remain in the US and contacted us. We submitted an I-130 petition and at the same time, applications to adjust status (I-485), work (I-765), and advance parole for travel (I-131). USCIS approved the I-130 petition and I-485 less than two months after filing. 2 weeks later, she received the green card in the mail.