Search
  • About Us
  • Services
  • 214(b)
  • 221(g)
    • Overview
    • Mandamus Lawsuit for Delays
  • Inadmissibility
    • Overview
    • 212(a)(5)(A) EB-3 Refusals
    • 212(a)(4)(A) Public Charge
    • Diversity Lottery Refusals
    • K-1 Visa Refusals
    • 40 Reasons for Student Visa Denials
    • 212(a)(9)(B) Unlawful Presence
    • 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material Misrepresentation / Fraud
    • 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(1) Crimes of Moral Turpitude
    • 212(a)(6)(E) Alien Smuggling
    • 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) Drug-Related Crimes
    • 212(a)(2)(C) Drug Trafficking
    • 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) Inadequate Documentation
    • False Claim to US Citizenship (INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii))
    • Expedited Removal
    • Boarding Foil Refusals in the I-730 Process
    • Humanitarian Parole
  • Waivers
    • Nonimmigrant Waivers
    • I-601 Immigrant Waivers
  • Revocation
    • Visa Revocation
    • Petition Revocation
  • Case Studies
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Consultation
  • Contact
EnRuCnEs
21550 Oxnard Street, Ste. 300
Los Angeles, CA 91367
WhatsApp:
+1 (818) 730-3540
EnRuCnEs
  • About Us
  • Services
  • 214(b)
  • 221(g)
    • Overview
    • Mandamus Lawsuit for Delays
  • Inadmissibility
    • Overview
    • 212(a)(5)(A) EB-3 Refusals
    • 212(a)(4)(A) Public Charge
    • Diversity Lottery Refusals
    • K-1 Visa Refusals
    • 40 Reasons for Student Visa Denials
    • 212(a)(9)(B) Unlawful Presence
    • 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Material Misrepresentation / Fraud
    • 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(1) Crimes of Moral Turpitude
    • 212(a)(6)(E) Alien Smuggling
    • 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) Drug-Related Crimes
    • 212(a)(2)(C) Drug Trafficking
    • 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) Inadequate Documentation
    • False Claim to US Citizenship (INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii))
    • Expedited Removal
    • Boarding Foil Refusals in the I-730 Process
    • Humanitarian Parole
  • Waivers
    • Nonimmigrant Waivers
    • I-601 Immigrant Waivers
  • Revocation
    • Visa Revocation
    • Petition Revocation
  • Case Studies
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Consultation
  • Contact
  1. Main
  2. Blog
  3. How the Department of State Empowers Extortionists and Miscreants

How the Department of State Empowers Extortionists and Miscreants

Posted on April 24, 2012

http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0424-white.shtm

Tags:Consular OfficersDepartment of StateUncategorizedVisa Refusal Rates

Blog

All blog posts

The tactics of “rogue” consular officers and CBP inspectors and what they don’t want you to know: you have rights.

Published on 18.10.2025

“After you arrived as a visitor to the US in the year [____], how long did it take for you to find a job?” The 90 Day Rule and 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Blues.

Published on 13.10.2025

Trump Bluster Meets The Law: “Just Because…” Is Not A Reason To Deny A Visa.

Published on 24.09.2025

Case Studies

A was an individual with extraordinary ability in the eyes of all — except the consular officer. Mr. V contacted us after his petition was referred for revocation. According to the consul, Mr. V was a “rank-and-file scientist”, did not have sustained acclaim, and that based on this “new information”, the consul referred the petition for revocation. But the consul was so egregiously wrong that we were able to impress upon consular management and Washington that Mr. V’s immigrant visa application should be reopened and reconsidered: that it would be unfair and unjust for Mr. V to have to wait for USCIS to review his case, a process that can take more than 6 months. After a couple of months of legal wrangling, dialog, and another interview, the Embassy issued to Mr. V his EB-1A immigrant visa. But that was not the end of Mr. V’s case. More than 10 years later, Mr. V applied to naturalize, and at his naturalization interview, a USCIS officer confronted Mr. V with the allegations in the consular revocation memorandum. In fact, USCIS considered denying his naturalization application and reviewing his current status — leaving open the possibility of rescinding his permanent resident status and deporting him. A contacted us, and we were able to attend and participate in his follow-up naturalization interview at the local USCIS office. Over all of those years we had retained Mr. V’s file in our archive, and were able to present it to USCIS — showing what had happened when he applied for the immigrant visa at the Embassy and how he had properly received the visa. After several months of review and investigation, USCIS approved his naturalization application and Mr. V was sworn in as a US citizen.

Case of A.V.
More case studies

©1996 – 2025White & Associates
All rights reserved. Practice Limited to Immigration and Nationality Law

Disclaimer
lofo